Errata for Learn to Program

#29986: In the third bullet-point under "2.4 A Few Things to Try":
". . . be as accurate--or not--you want.)"
should read
". . . be as accurate--or not--*as* you want.)"--Brett

#29987: The marginal comment on this page is garbled:
"Modulus, much like
integer division, might
seem bizarre, but they it
is actually really useful,
often when used with
integer division."

Huh?--Brett

#31155: The description of the code says "Note that I used rand(101) to get numbers from 0 to 100 and that rand(1) always returns 0." He's making a point there about using rand(100) would give you numbers up to 99. However, in the code example he's referring to, (bottom of the previous page) he actually uses rand(100) in the example he's referring to ... which makes this comment quite funny: "Not understanding the range of possible return values is the biggest mistake I see people make with rand, even professional programmers, and even in finished products you can buy at the store." Just goes to show that it's not always a lack of comprehension at fault.

#47318: Under "99 Bottles of Beer on the Wall >How you could do it:"

There is no solution. It just says:

#<NameError: undefined local variable or method ‘____________________' for #--Nate R