By Developers, For Developers
| PDF Pg | Paper Pg | Type | Description | Fixed on | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | TYPO | 3rd line - typo | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 102 | SUGGEST | 3rd line - typo | 2011-09-12 | ||
| 122 | TYPO | I think this line is missing a period? | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 145 | OK | This sentence is throwing me off - I read and re-read it trying to get it to make sense to my little pea-brain: | 2011-09-15 | Thanks -- considered, but I like the more subtle form. | |
| 147 | OK | You could do a smidge more with this sentence: | 2011-09-15 | For this spot I don't want to get into details; I just wanted to say that those titles fall in the same category. | |
| 104 | TYPO | Netlfix -> Netflix | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 37 | TYPO | “How to do you reconcile your clear decision with the complexity of Unix time-keeping?” | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 80 | TYPO | each type of computer had its down instruction set down -> should probably be own | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 23 | TYPO | theirneighbors (line 13) -> missing space | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 81 | TYPO | do you research and diversify: you -> your | 2011-08-01 | ||
| 114 | TYPO | Line 2: “be certain you doing” should probably be “be certain you’re doing” | 2011-09-12 | ||
| 98 | TYPO | The third paragraph’s third sentence (line 14) should be: “…cover all code you write for the duration…”. The word “right” is used incorrectly. | 2011-09-12 | ||
| 39 | TYPO | e e cummings should read E. E. Cummings | 2011-10-06 | ||
| 43 | SUGGEST | Mention RDoc along with Javadoc and Doxygen. You are, after all, using ruby. :D | 2011-10-06 | Changed to reference "JavaDoc---or whatever's appropriate" since the section is using C and Java as its examples. | |
| 104 | TYPO | One Your Side -> On Your Side | 2011-10-06 | ||
| 93 | 79 | ERROR | The following phrase was entered twice: The user should be able to specify the conversion as command-line arguments, -c (degrees Celsius) or -f (degrees Fahrenheit). | 2015-01-13 | |
| 27 | OK | Time Complexity should be there instead of TAME COMPLEXITY | 2015-01-13 | The section is about taming complexity... :) | |
| 16 | OK | The accurate page is my Chinese version. I think there is a mistake but you have not mention in the code. It is about reverse the str. char *copy = malloc(len); copy[len] = 0. | 2015-01-13 | This is a deliberate error in the code (see the top of the next page) |